Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761519›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

The Largest Response Component in the Motor Cortex Reflects Movement Timing but Not Movement Type.

Matthew T Kaufman, Jeffrey S Seely, David Sussillo, Stephen I Ryu, Krishna V Shenoy, Mark M Churchland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew T KaufmanNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-023X
Jeffrey S SeelyDepartment of Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-8422
David SussilloNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Stephen I RyuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Neurosurgery, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California 94301.
Krishna V ShenoyNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-1534-9240
Mark M ChurchlandDepartment of Neuroscience; Grossman Center for the Statistics of Mind, David Mahoney Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.

Funding

A dynamical systems approach to fundamental questions in neuroscienceDP2NS083037 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHURCHLAND, MARK M · 2012 to 2014
$2.6M
Toward an Animal Model of Freely Moving HumanDP1OD006409 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHENOY, KRISHNA V · 2009 to 2011
$2.5M
NIH HHS DP1 OD006409NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS083037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity in monkey motor cortex (M1) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) can reflect a chosen movement well before that movement begins. The pattern of neural activity then changes profoundly just before movement onset. We considered the prediction, derived from formal considerations, that the transition from preparation to movement might be accompanied by a large overall change in the neural state that reflects when movement is made rather than which movement is made. Specifically, we examined "components" of the population response: time-varying patterns of activity from which each neuron's response is approximately composed. Amid the response complexity of individual M1 and PMd neurons, we identified robust response components that were "condition-invariant": their magnitude and time course were nearly identical regardless of reach direction or path. These condition-invariant response components occupied dimensions orthogonal to those occupied by the "tuned" response components. The largest condition-invariant component was much larger than any of the tuned components; i.e., it explained more of the structure in individual-neuron responses. This condition-invariant response component underwent a rapid change before movement onset. The timing of that change predicted most of the trial-by-trial variance in reaction time. Thus, although individual M1 and PMd neurons essentially always reflected which movement was made, the largest component of the population response reflected movement timing rather than movement type.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsArmElectromyographyMacaca mulattaMaleMicroelectrodesMotor ActivityMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalNeuronsNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeTime Factorscondition-invariant signaldPCAmovement initiationmovement triggeringreaction timestate space

Identifiers

PMID27761519
PMCPMC5069299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.