Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761465›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2016

Shanmugaraj Gowrishankar, Arumugam Kamaladevi, Krishnaswamy Balamurugan, Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tripterhyponoid A fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spectrum of Virulence Factors in Clinical Isolates ofJournal of laboratory physicians · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Methicillin-ResistantMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shanmugaraj GowrishankarDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Science Campus, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003, India.
Arumugam KamaladeviDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Science Campus, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003, India.
Krishnaswamy BalamuruganDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Science Campus, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003, India.
Shunmugiah Karutha PandianDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Science Campus, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-0575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present investigation was deliberately aimed at evaluating the biofilm-forming ability of 63 clinical MRSA isolates recovered from pharyngitis patients through different phenotypic assays. The molecular detection of adhesion (

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPharyngitisBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsFemaleHumansMaleStaphylococcal InfectionsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27761465
PMCPMC5059529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.