Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761408›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2016

All-optical optoacoustic microscopy based on probe beam deflection technique.

Saher M Maswadi, Bennett L Ibey, Caleb C Roth, Dmitri A Tsyboulski, Hope T Beier, Randolph D Glickman, Alexander A Oraevsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Optical ultrasound sensors for photoacoustic imaging: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Perspective on fast-evolving photoacoustic tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optoacoustic mesoscopy for biomedicine.Nature biomedical engineering · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saher M MaswadiOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 4141 Petroleum Road, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA; EchoLase, Inc., 5234 Tomas Circle, San Antonio, TX 78240, USA.
Bennett L IbeyRadio Frequency Bioeffects Branch, Bioeffects Division, Human Effectiveness Directorate, 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, 4141 Petroleum Road, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Caleb C RothSchool of Medicine, Dept. of Radiological Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Dmitri A TsyboulskiTomoWave Laboratories, 6550 Mapleridge St., Houston, TX 77081, USA.
Hope T BeierOptical Radiation Branch, Bioeffects Division, Human Effectiveness Directorate, 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, 4141 Petroleum Road, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Randolph D GlickmanSchool of Medicine, Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; EchoLase, Inc., 5234 Tomas Circle, San Antonio, TX 78240, USA.
Alexander A OraevskyTomoWave Laboratories, 6550 Mapleridge St., Houston, TX 77081, USA.

Funding

Laser Ultrasound and Optoacoustic Endoscopy of EsophagusR43EB015287 · NIBIB · TOMOWAVE LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ORAEVSKY, ALEXANDER A · 2012 to 2012
$132k
NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB015287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optoacoustic (OA) microscopy using an all-optical system based on the probe beam deflection technique (PBDT) for detection of laser-induced acoustic signals was investigated as an alternative to conventional piezoelectric transducers. PBDT provides a number of advantages for OA microscopy including (i) efficient coupling of laser excitation energy to the samples being imaged through the probing laser beam, (ii) undistorted coupling of acoustic waves to the detector without the need for separation of the optical and acoustic paths, (iii) high sensitivity and (iv) ultrawide bandwidth. Because of the unimpeded optical path in PBDT, diffraction-limited lateral resolution can be readily achieved. The sensitivity of the current PBDT sensor of 22 μV/Pa and its noise equivalent pressure (NEP) of 11.4 Pa are comparable with these parameters of the optical micro-ring resonator and commercial piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers. Benefits of the present prototype OA microscope were demonstrated by successfully resolving micron-size details in histological sections of cardiac muscle.

Indexed as

All optical optoacoustic systemBackward mode optoacoustic microscopyNon-contact acoustic sensorOptical resolution photoacoustic imagingOptoacoustic tomographyProbe beam deflection technique

Identifiers

PMID27761408
PMCPMC5063357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.