ArticlePeerJ2016
Greater than
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ionic liquid-assisted seed genomic DNA extraction for advanced sequencing applications.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Long-read sequencing and genome assembly of natural history collection samples and challenging specimens.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Perish the thawed? EDTA reduces DNA degradation during extraction from frozen tissue.PloS one · 2025Article
- Long-read sequencing and genome assembly of natural history collection samples and challenging specimens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Versatile DNA extraction from diverse plant taxa using ionic liquids and magnetic ionic liquids: a methodological breakthrough for enhanced sample utility.Plant methods · 2024Article
- An in situ digital synthesis strategy for the discovery and description of ocean life.Science advances · 2024Article
- Greater than pH 8: The pH dependence of EDTA as a preservative of high molecular weight DNA in biological samples.PloS one · 2023Article
- The Prognostic Value of Liquid Biopsies for Benefit of Salvage Radiotherapy in Relapsed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing.GigaScience · 2022Article
- DESS deconstructed: Is EDTA solely responsible for protection of high molecular weight DNA in this common tissue preservative?PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Origins and biogeography of the Anolis crassulus subgroup (Squamata: Dactyloidae) in the highlands of Nuclear Central America.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Evaluation and comparison of FTA card and CTAB DNA extraction methods for non-agricultural taxa.Applications in plant sciences · 2017Article
- Rapid forest clearing in a Myanmar proposed national park threatens two newly discovered species of geckos (Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus).PloS one · 2017Article
- The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Standard specification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in biodiversity genomic sequencing will increasingly depend on the availability of DNA samples-and their quantifiable metadata-preserved in large institutional biorepositories that are discoverable to the scientific community. Improvements in sequencing technology constantly provide longer reads, such that longer fragment length, higher molecular weight, and overall "genome-quality" DNA (gDNA) will be desirable. Ideally, biorepositories should publish numerical scale measurements of DNA quality useful to the user community. However, the most widely used technique to evaluate DNA quality, the classic agarose gel, has yet to be quantified. Here we propose a simple and economical method using open source image analysis software to make gDNA gel images quantifiable, and propose percentage of gDNA "greater than
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.