Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761192›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiology case reports2016

CHAOS: Prenatal imaging findings with post mortem contrast radiographic correlation.

Kanika Gupta, Bhuvaneswari Venkatesan, Kiruba Shankar Manoharan, Vaithianathan Rajalakshmi, Maya Menon

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiology case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kanika GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, ESI Medical College and PGIMSR, K K Nagar, Chennai-600078. Tamil Nadu, India.
Bhuvaneswari VenkatesanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, ESI Medical College and PGIMSR, K K Nagar, Chennai-600078. Tamil Nadu, India.
Kiruba Shankar ManoharanDepartment of E.N.T, ESI Medical College and PGIMSR, K K Nagar, Chennai-600078. Tamil Nadu, India.
Vaithianathan RajalakshmiDepartment of Pathology, ESI Medical College and PGIMSR, K K Nagar, Chennai-600078. Tamil Nadu, India.
Maya MenonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESI Medical College and PGIMSR, K K Nagar, Chennai-600078. Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital high airway obstruction syndrome is a rare fetal anomaly with characteristic constellation of prenatal findings on ultrasound and MRI. The typical triad of imaging features are enlarged and echogenic lungs, flattening or inversion of diaphragm and fetal hydrops. Early prenatal recognition of congenital high airway obstruction syndrome by ultrasound and/or MRI is mandatory for the appropriate perinatal management. We report a case of a male fetus with typical imaging findings of congenital high airway obstruction syndrome on ultrasound and MRI at 19 weeks of gestation. The role of contrast radiographs of fetal airways, including retrograde laryngogram, in confirming the postnatal diagnosis of this fetal condition is demonstrated. The prenatal imaging findings were correlated with contrast radiographs of upper airways, sonography of aborted fetus and fetal autopsy findings.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdultAirway ObstructionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalCHAOScontrast radiographsEXITfetuslaryngeal obstructionprenatal diagnosisRetrograde laryngogramsubglottic stenosis

Identifiers

PMID27761192
PMCPMC5065282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.