Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27760752›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2016

Ectopic Trophoblast Allografts in the Horse Resist Destruction by Secondary Immune Responses.

Margaret M Brosnahan, Emily J Silvela, Jessica Crumb, Donald C Miller, Hollis N Erb, Douglas F Antczak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Placentation in Equids.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret M BrosnahanBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York.
Emily J SilvelaBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York.
Jessica CrumbBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York.
Donald C MillerBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York.
Hollis N ErbDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York.
Douglas F AntczakBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York DFA1@cornell.edu.
New York State College of Veterinary Medicine · USCornell University · US

Funding

Split Immunological Tolerance to TrophoblastR01HD049545 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI ANTCZAK, DOUGLAS FRANCIS · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
Immune tolerance to serial trophoblast transplantsK08HD065914 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BROSNAHAN, MARGARET MARY · 2010 to 2014
$517k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD065914NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive trophoblast from Day 34 horse conceptuses survives in extrauterine sites in allogeneic recipients that are immunologically naive to donor major histocompatibility complex class I antigens. The ectopic trophoblast retains its in utero characteristics, including similar lifespan, physiologic effect of its secreted product (equine chorionic gonadotropin) upon the recipient's ovaries, and induction of host immune responses. Immunologic memory has not been considered previously in this experimental system. We hypothesized that primary exposure to ectopic trophoblast would affect the recipient's immune status such that the survival time of subsequent transplants would be altered. Secondary transplant lifespans could be shortened by destructive memory responses, as has been observed in ectopic trophoblast studies in rodents, or lengthened, as occurs when male skin grafts follow multiple syngeneic pregnancies in mice. Eight mares received two closely spaced trophoblast transplants. Both grafts for each recipient were obtained from conceptuses sired by the same stallion to provide consistency in histocompatibility antigen exposure. Donor stallions were major histocompatibility complex class I homozygotes. Cytotoxic antibody production was tracked to monitor recipients' immune responses to the transplants. Detection of serum equine chorionic gonadotropin was used as a proxy for transplant lifespan. There was no significant difference between the distributions of primary and secondary transplant lifespans, despite evidence of immunologic memory. These data demonstrate that secondary ectopic trophoblast transplants in horses do not experience earlier destruction or prolonged survival following immune priming of recipients. Mechanisms responsible for the eventual demise of the transplants remain unperturbed by secondary immune responses or chronic antigenic exposure.

Indexed as

AllograftsAnimalsFemaleGraft SurvivalHorsesImmunity, ActiveTrophoblastsequidsimmunologyreproductive immunologytransplantationtrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID27760752
PMCPMC5315430
OpenAlexW2536414335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.