Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27760750›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2016

Random Allocation of Blastomere Descendants to the Trophectoderm and ICM of the Bovine Blastocyst.

Lessly P Sepulveda-Rincon, Delphine Dube, Pierre Adenot, Ludivine Laffont, Sylvie Ruffini, Laurence Gall, Bruce K Campbell, Veronique Duranthon, Nathalie Beaujean, Walid E Maalouf

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The effects of embryo splitting onIranian journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lessly P Sepulveda-RinconChild Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Delphine DubeUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Pierre AdenotUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Ludivine LaffontUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Sylvie RuffiniUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Laurence GallUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Bruce K CampbellChild Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Veronique DuranthonUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France.
Nathalie BeaujeanUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, Jouy en Josas, France nathalie.beaujean@inserm.fr.
Walid E MaaloufChild Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRInstitut Cellule Souche et Cerveau · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first lineage specification during mammalian embryo development can be visually distinguished at the blastocyst stage. Two cell lineages are observed on the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the blastocyst: the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm. The timing and mechanisms driving this process are still not fully understood. In mouse embryos, cells seem prepatterned to become certain cell lineage because the first cleavage plane has been related with further embryonic-abembryonic axis at the blastocyst stage. Nevertheless, this possibility has been very debatable. Our objective was to determine whether this would be the case in another mammalian species, the bovine. To achieve this, cells of in vitro produced bovine embryos were traced from the 2-cell stage to the blastocyst stage. Blastocysts were then classified according to the allocation of the labeled cells in the embryonic and/or abembryonic part of the blastocyst. Surprisingly, we found that there is a significant percentage of the embryos (∼60%) with labeled and nonlabeled cells randomly distributed and intermingled. Using time-lapse microscopy, we have identified the emergence of this random pattern at the third to fourth cell cycle, when cells started to intermingle. Even though no differences were found on morphokinetics among different embryos, these random blastocysts and those with labeled cells separated by the embryonic-abembryonic axis (deviant pattern) are significantly bigger; moreover deviant embryos have a significantly higher number of cells. Interestingly, we observed that daughter cells allocation at the blastocyst stage is not affected by biopsies performed at an earlier stage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystBlastomeresCattleCell LineageDNA MethylationEmbryonic DevelopmentHistonesHistonesblastocystembryo biopsyH3 arginine methylationpatterningpreimplantation developmenttime-lapse microscopy

Identifiers

PMID27760750
PMCPMC5333943
OpenAlexW2533260784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.