Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27760542›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2016

A 10-day vacancy period after cleaning and disinfection has no effect on the bacterial load in pig nursery units.

K Luyckx, S Millet, S Van Weyenberg, L Herman, M Heyndrickx, J Dewulf, K De Reu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Insights into the genomic and phenotypic characteristics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial policies in animals and human health.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K LuyckxInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
S MilletInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
S Van WeyenbergInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
L HermanInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
M HeyndrickxInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
J DewulfVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
K De ReuInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium. koen.dereu@ilvo.vlaanderen.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiosecurity measures such as cleaning, disinfection and a vacancy period between production cycles on pig farms are essential to prevent disease outbreaks. No studies have tested the effect of a longer vacancy period on bacterial load in nursery units.

methodsThe present study evaluated the effect of a 10-day vacancy period in pig nursery units on total aerobic flora, Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli, faecal coliforms and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Three vacancy periods of 10 days were monitored, each time applied in 3 units. The microbiological load was measured before disinfection and at 1, 4, 7 and 10 days after disinfection.

resultsNo significant decrease or increase in E. coli, faecal coliforms, MRSA and Enterococcus spp. was noticed. Total aerobic flora counts were the lowest on day 4 after disinfection (i.e. 4.07 log CFU/625 cm

conclusionsThis study indicates that prolonging the vacancy period in nursery units to 10 days after disinfection with no extra biosecurity measures has no impact on the environmental load of total aerobic flora, E. coli, faecal coliforms, MRSA and Enterococcus spp..

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacterial LoadDisinfectionHousing, AnimalSwineTime FactorsBacterial loadBetween batch vacancyCleaning and disinfectionNursery pigs

Identifiers

PMID27760542
PMCPMC5069936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.