Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27760366›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Wei Dong, Elizabeth S Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei DongVA Loma Linda Health Care System and Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Elizabeth S OlsonOtalaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York. Electronic address: eao2004@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Auditory Mechanics and Cochlear AmplificationR01DC015362 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELIZABETH S. OLSON · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
OBSERVING AUDITORY MECHANICS WITH PRESSURE MEASUREMENTSR01DC003130 · NIDCD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI OLSON, ELIZABETH S. · 2001 to 2015
$4.8M
Exploring otoacoustic emissions with intracochlear pressure and motion measuremenR01DC011506 · NIDCD · LOMA LINDA VETERANS ASSN RESEARCH & EDUC · PI DONG, WEI · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003130NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011506NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015362RRD VA I01 RX002296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear frequency tuning is based on a mildly tuned traveling-wave response that is enhanced in amplitude and sharpness by outer hair cell (OHC)-based forces. The nonlinear and active character of this enhancement is the fundamental manifestation of cochlear amplification. Recently, mechanical (pressure) and electrical (extracellular OHC-generated voltage) responses were simultaneously measured close to the sensory tissue's basilar membrane. Both pressure and voltage were tuned and showed traveling-wave phase accumulation, evidence that they were locally generated responses. Approximately at the frequency where nonlinearity commenced, the phase of extracellular voltage shifted up, to lead pressure by >1/4 cycle. Based on established and fundamental relationships among voltage, force, pressure, displacement, and power, the observed phase shift was identified as the activation of cochlear amplification. In this study, the operation of the cochlear amplifier was further explored, via changes in pressure and voltage responses upon delivery of a second, suppressor tone. Two different suppression paradigms were used, one with a low-frequency suppressor and a swept-frequency probe, the other with two swept-frequency tones, either of which can be considered as probe or suppressor. In the presence of a high-level low-frequency suppressor, extracellular voltage responses at probe-tone frequencies were greatly reduced, and the pressure responses were reduced nearly to their linear, passive level. On the other hand, the amplifier-activating phase shift between pressure and voltage responses was still present in probe-tone responses. These findings are consistent with low-frequency suppression being caused by the saturation of OHC electrical responses and not by a change in the power-enabling phasing of the underlying mechanics. In the two-tone swept-frequency suppression paradigm, mild suppression was apparent in the pressure responses, while deep notches could develop in the voltage responses. A simple analysis, based on a two-wave differencing scheme, was used to explore the observations.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaMechanical PhenomenaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCochleaGerbillinaeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27760366
PMCPMC5073056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.