ReviewBiophysical journal2016
Theory from the Oster Laboratory Leaps Ahead of Experiment in Understanding Actin-Based Cellular Motility.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy-based modelling of single actin filament polymerization using bond graphs.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Active viscoelastic models for cell and tissue mechanics.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Bridging from single to collective cell migration: A review of models and links to experiments.PLoS computational biology · 2020Review
- The Actin Cytoskeleton as an Active Adaptive Material.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2020Article
- Cytoskeletal control of B cell responses to antigens.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.