Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27759998›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2017

Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education.

Michael Dau, Amir Edalatpour, Ralf Schulze, Bilal Al-Nawas, Abdulmonem Alshihri, Peer W Kämmerer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael Dau1 Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, University Medical Centre, University of Rostock, Germany.
Amir Edalatpour2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ralf Schulze3 Department of Oral Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Bilal Al-Nawas2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Abdulmonem Alshihri4 Department of Prosthetic and Biomaterial Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Peer W Kämmerer1 Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, University Medical Centre, University of Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the subjective quality rating of panoramic radiography (PAN) and CBCT in the planning of dental implant procedures by clinicians with different educational backgrounds.

methodsRadiographic images (PAN and CBCT) of 42 patients were examined as follows: the maxillary (MX) anterior region of patients, the MX posterior region of 16 patients and the mandibular (MD) posterior region of 16 patients. These sites were used for planning of dental implant insertion. Data sets were analyzed by examiners with different training backgrounds: three general practitioners (GP), three oral surgeons (OS) and three maxillofacial surgeons (MS). A standardized questionnaire in a standardized setting was answered by participants.

resultsThe majority of participants rated an additional CBCT as "required" (14.0%) or "reasonable" (56.1%). These ratings depended strongly on the area of interest (MX anterior region: 31.1 and 58.9%; MX posterior region: 14.6 and 62.5%; and MD posterior region: 2.8% and 47.9%). MS classified CBCT as required more often than GP and OS (23.8 vs 10.3 and 7.9%; p < 0.001). With the additional information of CBCT, "therapy affecting" ratings were stated high in all groups.

conclusionsEspecially in the anterior and posterior MX, significant subjective benefits for an additional CBCT were seen for planning of dental implant procedures. Participants with fundamental medical education asked for CBCT more often. The results indicate that an improved education in three-dimensional dental radiology is necessary.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ImplantsPatient Care PlanningRadiography, PanoramicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDental Implantsbony implant siteCBCTeducationpanoramic radiographysubjective rating

Identifiers

PMID27759998
PMCPMC5595007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.