SynthesisMedicine2016
Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cancer stem cell markers CD44 and CD133 in patients with gastric cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis with 4729 patients involved.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review of the Evidence.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- WEE1 stabilizes MYC to promote therapeutic resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma.Cancer letters · 2026Article
- MCM10, a novel YAP1/TEAD4 target, drives gastric cancer progression by bridging DNA replication to stemness acquisition.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- ECT2NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Update on the Association of CD44 Expression with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2025Article
- Illuminating the Role of Wound Healing-Related Hub Genes in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Prognostic Implications and Therapeutic Potential.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Article
- Cancer stem cells in personalized therapy: mechanisms, microenvironment crosstalk, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Review
- The Impact of Glycosylation on the Functional Activity of CD133 and the Accuracy of Its Immunodetection.Biology · 2024Review
- The prognostic value of cancer stem cell markers in thyroid cancer: a systematic review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
- Can CD133 Be Regarded as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oncology: Pros and Cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Outcomes Associated With ABCG2 and CD133 Expression in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Surgical Resection.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023Article
- Review
- Issues of origin, morphology and clinical significance of tumor microvessels in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Molecular subclassification of gastrointestinal cancers based on cancer stem cell traits.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2021Review
- Slug and CD133 expression are associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis and survival in gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Alteration in stemness causes exclusivity between Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and microsatellite instability status in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021Article
- Transcriptional and Epigenetic Bioinformatic Analysis of Claudin-9 Regulation in Gastric Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Tumour stem cell markers CD133 and CD44 are useful prognostic factors after surgical resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- The Expression of p53, CD44, Ki-67, and HER-2/neu Markers in Gastric Cancer and Its Association with Histopathological Indicators: A Retrospective Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, CD44 and CD133 have been identified as 2 common used cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in gastric cancer. However, the clinicopathological and prognostic value of these markers in gastric cancer remains controversial; moreover, there is lack of comparison of these 2 markers' roles in clinical applications. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate these markers' clinicopathological features and association with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.
methodsEligible studies were identified and odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were analyzed as well. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger tests.
resultsThe meta-analysis included 26 studies involving 4729 patients. High expression of CD44 was associated with Lauren type (intestinal type) (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.02-2.30]; P = 0.038) and lymphatic vessel invasion (OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.06-1.76]; P = 0.021). CD133 overexpression was related to high TNM stage (III/IV) (OR, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.48-4.07]; P = 0.000), high depth of invasion (T3/T4) (OR, 2.97 [95% CI, 2.20-4.03]; P = 0.000), lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.82 [95% CI, 2.16-3.69]; P = 0.000), vascular invasion (OR, 6.71 [95% CI, 1.63-27.63]; P = 0.008), and distant metastasis (OR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.64-3.29]; P = 0.000). In addition, survival analysis demonstrated a significant association between CD44, as well as CD133 and poor 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.55-2.26]; P = 0.000; HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.76-2.44]; P = 0.000, respectively).
conclusionThese data suggest that upregulated expression of CD44 and CD133 correlates with several clinicopathological features and poor prognosis. Since the related features do not overlap, combined detection of CD44 and CD133 expression can be an especially effective tool for pathological diagnosis and prognostic prediction of gastric cancer patients in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.