Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27759172›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Adverse events associated with interactions with dietary and herbal supplements among inpatients.

Ilana Levy, Samuel Attias, Eran Ben-Arye, Lee Goldstein, Elad Schiff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation of an integrative safety consultation service for the use of dietary and herbal supplements among patients with hematological diseases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Real-world Evidence of the Herb-drug Interactions.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. An Overview on Different L-Thyroxine (l-TFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Sport Dietary Supplements and Physical Activity in Biomedical Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilana LevyInternal Medicine B Department, Bnai Zion Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel.
Samuel AttiasComplementary Medicine Department, Bnai Zion Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel.
Eran Ben-AryeRappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Lee GoldsteinRappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Elad SchiffInternal Medicine B Department, Bnai Zion Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDietary and herbal supplements (DHS) are commonly used among inpatients and may cause interactions with drugs or other DHS. This study explored whether adverse events were actually associated with such interactions and examined specific characteristics among inpatient DHS users prone to such adverse events.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 947 patients hospitalized in 12 departments of a tertiary academic medical centre in Haifa, Israel. It evaluated the rate of DHS use among inpatients, the potential for interactions, and actual adverse events during hospitalization associated with DHS use. It also assessed whether DHS consumption was documented in patients' medical files. Statistical analysis was used to delineate DHS users at risk for adverse events associated with interactions with conventional drugs or other DHS.

resultsIn 17 (3.7%) of the 458 DHS users, an adverse event may have been caused by DHS-drug-DHS interactions. According to the Drug Interaction Probability Scale, 14 interactions 'probably' caused the adverse events, and 11 'possibly' caused them. Interactions occurred more frequently in older patients (P = 0.025, 95% CI: 2.26-19.7), patients born outside Israel (P = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.03-0.42), those with ophthalmologic (P = 0.032, 95% CI: 0.02-0.37) or gastrointestinal (P = 0.008, 95% CI: 0.05-0.46) comorbidities, and those using higher numbers of DHS (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.52-2.48) or drugs (P = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.23-3.77).

conclusionsApproximately one in 55 hospitalizations in this study may have been caused by adverse events associated with DHS-drug-DHS interactions. To minimize the actual occurrence of adverse events, medical staff education regarding DHS should be improved.

Indexed as

Herb-Drug InteractionsInpatientsAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleHospitalizationHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiescomplementary medicinedrug interactionsherbal medicine

Identifiers

PMID27759172
PMCPMC5346861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.