ArticleScientific reports2016
Nondestructive, real-time determination and visualization of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin by luminescent oligothiophenes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Production of Hydrogels from Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Fractionation of Blackcurrant Pomace.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fluorescent optotracers for bacterial and biofilm detection and diagnostics.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2023Review
- Structural Properties Dictating Selective Optotracer Detection of Staphylococcus aureus.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Optotracing for live selective fluorescence-based detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Current and future advances in fluorescence-based visualization of plant cell wall components and cell wall biosynthetic machineries.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Review
- Article
- Conjugated Oligo- and Polymers for Bacterial Sensing.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
- Stereochemical identification of glucans by oligothiophenes enables cellulose anatomical mapping in plant tissues.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Progress and Opportunities in the Characterization of Cellulose - An Important Regulator of Cell Wall Growth and Mechanics.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Lignocellulosic Biomass Transformations via Greener Oxidative Pretreatment Processes: Access to Energy and Value-Added Chemicals.Frontiers in chemistry · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enabling technologies for efficient use of the bio-based feedstock are crucial to the replacement of oil-based products. We investigated the feasibility of luminescent conjugated oligothiophenes (LCOs) for non-destructive, rapid detection and quality assessment of lignocellulosic components in complex biomass matrices. A cationic pentameric oligothiophene denoted p-HTEA (pentamer hydrogen thiophene ethyl amine) showed unique binding affinities to cellulose, lignin, hemicelluloses, and cellulose nanofibrils in crystal, liquid and paper form. We exploited this finding using spectrofluorometric methods and fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy, for sensitive, simultaneous determination of the structural and compositional complexities of native lignocellulosic biomass. With exceptional photostability, p-HTEA is also demonstrated as a dynamic sensor for real-time monitoring of enzymatic cellulose degradation in cellulolysis. These results demonstrate the use of p-HTEA as a non-destructive tool for the determination of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in complex biomass matrices, thereby aiding in the optimization of biomass-converting technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.