Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27759057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Hepatic 3D spheroid models for the detection and study of compounds with cholestatic liability.

Delilah F G Hendriks, Lisa Fredriksson Puigvert, Simon Messner, Wolfgang Mortiz, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating cannabidiol-induced liver injury with and without valproate using a three-dimensional human hepatocyte spheroid model.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. In vitro liver models for toxicological research.Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advancing Toxicity Predictions: A Review onEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Cholangiocyte organoids to study drug-induced injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Delilah F G HendriksDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisa Fredriksson PuigvertDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Simon MessnerInSphero AG, Schlieren, Canton of Zürich, Switzerland.
Wolfgang MortizInSphero AG, Schlieren, Canton of Zürich, Switzerland.
Magnus Ingelman-SundbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEInspire · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) is poorly understood and its preclinical prediction is mainly limited to assessing the compound's potential to inhibit the bile salt export pump (BSEP). Here, we evaluated two 3D spheroid models, one from primary human hepatocytes (PHH) and one from HepaRG cells, for the detection of compounds with cholestatic liability. By repeatedly co-exposing both models to a set of compounds with different mechanisms of hepatotoxicity and a non-toxic concentrated bile acid (BA) mixture for 8 days we observed a selective synergistic toxicity of compounds known to cause cholestatic or mixed cholestatic/hepatocellular toxicity and the BA mixture compared to exposure to the compounds alone, a phenomenon that was more pronounced after extending the exposure time to 14 days. In contrast, no such synergism was observed after both 8 and 14 days of exposure to the BA mixture for compounds that cause non-cholestatic hepatotoxicity. Mechanisms behind the toxicity of the cholestatic compound chlorpromazine were accurately detected in both spheroid models, including intracellular BA accumulation, inhibition of ABCB11 expression and disruption of the F-actin cytoskeleton. Furthermore, the observed synergistic toxicity of chlorpromazine and BA was associated with increased oxidative stress and modulation of death receptor signalling. Combined, our results demonstrate that the hepatic spheroid models presented here can be used to detect and study compounds with cholestatic liability.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsBiological TransportCell Culture TechniquesCell LineChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryChlorpromazineCholestasisHepatocytesHumansOxidative StressReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandSignal TransductionSpheroids, CellularBile Acids and SaltschlorproethazineChlorpromazineReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

Identifiers

PMID27759057
PMCPMC5069690
OpenAlexW2539243243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.