Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27759056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Visual attention spreads broadly but selects information locally.

Satoshi Shioiri, Hajime Honjyo, Yoshiyuki Kashiwase, Kazumichi Matsumiya, Ichiro Kuriki

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoshi ShioiriResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.
Hajime HonjyoResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.
Yoshiyuki KashiwaseResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.
Kazumichi MatsumiyaResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.
Ichiro KurikiResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual attention spreads over a range around the focus as the spotlight metaphor describes. Spatial spread of attentional enhancement and local selection/inhibition are crucial factors determining the profile of the spatial attention. Enhancement and ignorance/suppression are opposite effects of attention, and appeared to be mutually exclusive. Yet, no unified view of the factors has been provided despite their necessity for understanding the functions of spatial attention. This report provides electroencephalographic and behavioral evidence for the attentional spread at an early stage and selection/inhibition at a later stage of visual processing. Steady state visual evoked potential showed broad spatial tuning whereas the P3 component of the event related potential showed local selection or inhibition of the adjacent areas. Based on these results, we propose a two-stage model of spatial attention with broad spread at an early stage and local selection at a later stage.

Indexed as

Biobehavioral SciencesEvoked Potentials, VisualAdultAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBehaviorElectroencephalographyHumansMalePhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27759056
PMCPMC5069499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.