Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27758888›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Genetic Polymorphisms in the Long Noncoding RNA MIR2052HG Offer a Pharmacogenomic Basis for the Response of Breast Cancer Patients to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy.

James N Ingle, Fang Xie, Matthew J Ellis, Paul E Goss, Lois E Shepherd, Judith-Anne W Chapman, Bingshu E Chen, Michiaki Kubo, Yoichi Furukawa, Yukihide Momozawa and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genomewide Association Studies in Pharmacogenomics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

James N IngleDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. ingle.james@mayo.edu.
Fang XieDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew J EllisBaylor Breast Center, Houston, Texas.
Paul E GossMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lois E ShepherdCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Judith-Anne W ChapmanCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Bingshu E ChenCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michiaki KuboRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoichi FurukawaUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihide MomozawaRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan.
Vered StearnsJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kathleen I PritchardSunnybrook Odette Regional Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Poulami BarmanDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Erin E CarlsonDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew P GoetzDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Richard M WeinshilboumDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Krishna R KalariDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Liewei WangDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USCanadian Cancer Society · CAMayo Clinic in Florida · USRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPBreast Center · CHJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CATokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Drug Metabolizing EnzymesU19GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2010 to 2014
$15.8M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF PHASE II DRUG METABOLIZING ENZYMESU01GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2000 to 2009
$15.7M
NCIC Foreign AccrualsU10CA077202 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI EISENHAUER, ELIZABETH · 1998 to 2013
$14.6M
Investigate the role of TPD52-AMPK pathway in tumorigenesis and cancer therapyR01CA196648 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, LIEWEI · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196648NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077202NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061388NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic risks in breast cancer remain only partly understood. Here, we report the results of a genome-wide association study of germline DNA from 4,658 women, including 252 women experiencing a breast cancer recurrence, who were entered on the MA.27 adjuvant trial comparing the aromatase inhibitors (AI) anastrozole and exemestane. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of top significance were identified in the gene encoding MIR2052HG, a long noncoding RNA of unknown function. Heterozygous or homozygous individuals for variant alleles exhibited a ∼40% or ∼63% decrease, respectively, in the hazard of breast cancer recurrence relative to homozygous wild-type individuals. Functional genomic studies in lymphoblastoid cell lines and ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines showed that expression from MIR2052HG and the ESR1 gene encoding estrogen receptor-α (ERα) was induced by estrogen and AI in a SNP-dependent manner. Variant SNP genotypes exhibited increased ERα binding to estrogen response elements, relative to wild-type genotypes, a pattern that was reversed by AI treatment. Further, variant SNPs were associated with lower expression of MIR2052HG and ERα. RNAi-mediated silencing of MIR2052HG in breast cancer cell lines decreased ERα expression, cell proliferation, and anchorage-independent colony formation. Mechanistic investigations revealed that MIR2052HG sustained ERα levels both by promoting AKT/FOXO3-mediated ESR1 transcription and by limiting ubiquitin-mediated, proteasome-dependent degradation of ERα. Taken together, our results define MIR2052HS as a functionally polymorphic gene that affects risks of breast cancer recurrence in women treated with AI. More broadly, our results offer a pharmacogenomic basis to understand differences in the response of breast cancer patients to AI therapy. Cancer Res; 76(23); 7012-23. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMiddle AgedPolymorphism, GeneticRNA, Long NoncodingAromatase InhibitorsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID27758888
PMCPMC5135610
OpenAlexW2530382286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.