SynthesisBioscience reports2016
Correlation of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism with rheumatic heart disease: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Genetic Control of the Rheumatic Heart: Closing the Genotype-Phenotype Gap.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- I/D Polymorphism Gene ACE and Risk of Preeclampsia in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Disease markers · 2020Article
- Towards developing a vaccine for rheumatic heart disease.Global cardiology science & practice · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a serious cardiovascular disorder worldwide. Several articles have reported the effect of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphism in RHD risk. However, the results still remain inconsistent. The objective of the present study was to assess more precise estimations of the relationship between ACE I/D variant and RHD susceptibility. Relevant case-control studies published between January 2000 and 2016 were searched in the electronic databases. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed to calculate the strength of the effect. A total of nine articles were retrieved, including 1333 RHD patients and 1212 healthy controls. Overall, our result did not detect a significant association between ACE I/D polymorphism and RHD risk under each genetic model (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed no positive relationship in Asians as well (P > 0.05). With respect to the severity of RHD, our result found that the frequency differences between mitral valve lesion (MVL), combined valve lesion (CVL) and healthy controls were not significantly different. Furthermore, no significant association was found between female, male RHD patients and the controls regarding to the ACE I/D polymorphism. In conclusion, our result indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism might not be a risk factor for RHD progression based on the existing research results. Additional well-designed studies with larger samples are still needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.