Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27758821›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2017

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin as graft- versus-host disease prophylaxis in haploidentical transplant.

Annalisa Ruggeri, Yuqian Sun, Myriam Labopin, Andrea Bacigalupo, Francesca Lorentino, William Arcese, Stella Santarone, Zafer Gülbas, Didier Blaise, Giuseppe Messina and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Post-transplant cyclophosphamideFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Annalisa RuggeriService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France annalisa.ruggeri@aphp.fr.
Yuqian SunPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.
Myriam LabopinService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Andrea BacigalupoOspedale San Martino, Department of Haematology II, Genova, Italy.
Francesca LorentinoOspedale San Raffaele, Haematology and BMT, Milano, Italy.
William ArceseTor Vergata University, Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Stella SantaroneOspedale Civile Dipartimento di Ematologia, Medicina Trasfusionale e Biotecnologie, Pescara, Italy.
Zafer GülbasAnadolu Medical Center Hospital, Bone Marrow Transplantation Department, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Didier BlaiseProgramme de Transplantation & Therapie Cellulaire, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Giuseppe MessinaCentro Unico Regionale Trapianti, Alberto Neri, Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Ardeshi GhavamzadehShariati Hospital, Hematology-Oncology and BMT Research, Teheran, Iran.
Florent MalardService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Benedetto BrunoA.O.U Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Jose Luis Diez-MartinInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Division of Hematology, Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Yener KocMedical Park Hospitals, Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Antalya, Turkey.
Fabio CiceriOspedale San Raffaele, Haematology and BMT, Milano, Italy.
Mohamad MohtyService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Arnon NaglerUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITSorbonne Université · FRAntalya IVF · TRCollegio Carlo Alberto · ITHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FROspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPeking University · CNPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITShariati Hospital · IRTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe graft-versus-host disease is a major barrier for non-T-cell-depleted haploidentical stem cell transplantation. There is no consensus on the optimal graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. This study compared the two most commonly used graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimens (post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based vs. the anti-thymocyte globulin-based) in adults with acute myeloid leukemia reported to the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. A total of 308 patients were analyzed; 193 received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen and 115 anti-thymocyte globulin-based regimen as anti-graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. The post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen was more likely to be associated to bone marrow as graft source (60% vs. 40%; P=0.01). Patients in the post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen group had significantly less grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease than those in the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group (5% vs. 12%, respectively; P=0.01), comparable to chronic graft-versus-host disease. Multivariate analysis showed that non-relapse mortality was lower in the post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen group [22% vs. 30%, Hazard ratio (HR) 1.77(95%CI: 1.09-2.86); P=0.02] with no difference in relapse incidence. Patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen had better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival [HR 1.45 (95%CI: 1.04-2.02); P=0.03] and leukemia-free survival [HR 1.48 (95%CI: 1.03-2.12); P=0.03] than those in the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group. In the multivariate analysis, there was also a trend for a higher overall survival [HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.98-2.09); P=0.06] for post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen versus the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group. Notably, center experience was also associated with non-relapse mortality and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival. Haplo-SCT using a post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen can achieve better leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality as compared to anti-thymocyte globulin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Indexed as

HaplotypesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAntilymphocyte SerumChemopreventionCyclophosphamideFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHLA AntigensHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAntilymphocyte SerumCyclophosphamideHLA AntigensImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID27758821
PMCPMC5286948
OpenAlexW2529331955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.