ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016
Beyond open data: realising the health benefits of sharing data.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The lymphatic filariasis treatment study landscape: A systematic review of study characteristics and the case for an individual participant data platform.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.BMC medical ethics · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of the scrub typhus treatment landscape: Assessing the feasibility of an individual participant-level data (IPD) platform.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of chloroquine and primaquine in healthy volunteers.Malaria journal · 2022Trial
- Reimagining Tuberculosis Control in the Era of Genomics: The Case for Global Investment inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of cardiology journals.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Publication of data sharing statements in clinical trials by cardiovascular journals: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.Scientific data · 2025Article
- DBSCAN and DBCV application to open medical records heterogeneous data for identifying clinically significant clusters of patients with neuroblastoma.BioData mining · 2025Article
- A survey on UK researchers' views regarding their experiences with the de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cohort Profile Update: Magu Health and Demographic Surveillance System, Tanzania.International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- FAIR, ethical, and coordinated data sharing for COVID-19 response: a scoping review and cross-sectional survey of COVID-19 data sharing platforms and registries.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for avoiding pitfalls in multi-omics data integration analyses.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders' perspectives.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Article
- How do we measure the costs, benefits, and harms of sharing data from biomedical studies? A protocol for a scoping review.Open research Europe · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.