Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27758773›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Emergency Department MRI Scanning of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Worthwhile or Wasteful?

J Pakpoor, D Saylor, I Izbudak, L Liu, E M Mowry, D M Yousem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017
    Article
  5. Emergency Department MR Imaging Scanner: Supportive Data.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J PakpoorFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (J.P., I.I., L.L., D.M.Y.), Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science.ORCID 0000-0003-0517-9583
D SaylorDepartment of Neurology (D.S., E.M.M.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9297-0244
I IzbudakFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (J.P., I.I., L.L., D.M.Y.), Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science.ORCID 0000-0002-9845-5171
L LiuFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (J.P., I.I., L.L., D.M.Y.), Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-2372
E M MowryDepartment of Neurology (D.S., E.M.M.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-5188
D M YousemFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (J.P., I.I., L.L., D.M.Y.), Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science dyousem1@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-6643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe increasing use of the emergency department MR imaging scanner at our institution raises questions about its added value to certain patient groups. We hypothesized that the use of emergency department MR imaging for identifying active demyelination in MS patients presenting with new neurologic symptoms would be of low yield. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectronic medical records were reviewed for patients with MS who had emergency department MR imaging scans for a suspected MS exacerbation between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2016. Details surrounding patient disposition, imaging, diagnosis, and management were determined.

resultsOf 115 patients in our study, 48 (41.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with an MS exacerbation. Nearly all patients with MS exacerbations (87.5%, 42/48) had active demyelination on their emergency department MR imaging, identified on 30.6% (33/108) of brain MRIs and 20.4% (19/93) of spinal MRIs. The presence of active demyelination at MRI was significantly associated with the ultimate diagnosis of an MS exacerbation (P < .001). MR imaging activity isolated to the spinal cord (ie, not found on concurrent brain MR imaging) was present in only 9 of 93 (9.7%) cases. Pseudoexacerbations accounted for 18 of the alternative diagnoses.

conclusionsEmergency department MR imaging is a worthwhile endeavor from a diagnostic standpoint for MS exacerbations despite not being part of the diagnostic criteria. This finding has corresponding downstream impact on management decisions to admit and/or administer intravenous steroids. However, we raise the question of whether clinicians over-rely on emergency department imaging for making exacerbation diagnoses. Additionally, spinal MR imaging is of questionable value as an addition to brain MR imaging due to a low yield of isolated spinal disease.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultDemyelinating DiseasesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27758773
PMCPMC7963651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.