Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27758726›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2017

Policies, guideline implementation and practice change - how can the process be understood?

T Becker, R Kilian, M Kösters

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Integrated Mental Health Care Programme in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence, knowledge, implementation: glossary of terminology.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry II,Ulm University,Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, FRG,Germany.
R KilianDepartment of Psychiatry II,Ulm University,Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, FRG,Germany.
M KöstersDepartment of Psychiatry II,Ulm University,Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, FRG,Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Politics and policy: It is important to understand why, in the translational continuum from pilot research and randomised controlled efficacy trials to roll-out programmes and routine effectiveness studies, some service innovations are taken up by health service purchasers and providers, while others are not. Why do some innovative interventions or models of care get to the stage of implementation, while others fail to be funded?

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGuideline AdherencePolicyPoliticsHumansGuideline implementationhealth care systeminnovative interventionsmodels of careroutine effectiveness studies

Identifiers

PMID27758726
PMCPMC6998687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.