Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757919›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2016

Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tao Gu, Neel Shah, Gaurav Deshpande, Derek H Tang, Debra F Eisenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of rheumatologists' knowledge of biosimilars.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Navigating through the healthcare system with atopic dermatitis: Analysing patient journeys in Germany.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A New Venue of TNF Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao GuHealthCore, Inc., 123 S. Justison Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE, 19801-5134, USA. TGu@healthcore.com.
Neel ShahAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Gaurav DeshpandeHealthCore, Inc., 123 S. Justison Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE, 19801-5134, USA.
Derek H TangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Debra F EisenbergHealthCore, Inc., 123 S. Justison Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE, 19801-5134, USA.
Wilmington University · USAmgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers.

objectivesOur objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patterns in US managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis.

methodsThis retrospective study used administrative claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD

resultsMost of the 24,460 patients received etanercept (48 %), adalimumab (29 %), or infliximab (12 %) as the index biologic. On the index date, 44 % were new to biologic therapy and 56 % were continuing biologic therapy. Biologic cost per treated patient for 1 year was as follows: etanercept $US24,859, adalimumab $US26,537, and infliximab $US26,468. Treatment patterns across indications for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were as follows: persistent (52, 49, 67 %), restarted (23, 21, 12 %), switched (12, 13, 11 %), and discontinued (14, 18, 10 %).

conclusionsThese findings from a large health benefits organization in the USA are similar to those of several previous cost analyses assessing different populations, which demonstrates the external validity of the results from the previous studies, both over time and across large populations.

Identifiers

PMID27757919
PMCPMC5127933
OpenAlexW2537088116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.