ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017
Modification of the 2012 CKD-EPI equations for the elderly Chinese.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations for Various Age Groups, Disease Conditions and Ethnicities in Asia: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- A comparison between 2017 FAS and 2012 CKD-EPI equations: a multi-center validation study in Chinese adult population.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur previous studies demonstrated that 2012 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations were inaccurate enough for estimating glomerular filtration rate in elderly Chinese. Thus, this study was constructed to modify these equations.
methodsA total of 839 subjects (aged ≥60 years) from four hospitals in China between October 2009 and December 2014 were included. A random sample of 674 (80.3 %) subjects was used as a training sample set, and the remaining 165 (19.7 %) subjects as the verification set. The equations were modified using the hill-climbing algorithm.
resultsCompared with the original CKD-EPI equations, the accuracy assessment indexes (bias, precision, accuracy and misclassification) were obviously improved after modification. Bland-Altman analysis also demonstrated that this modification attempt gained success to some extent.
conclusionsThe modified 2012 CKD-EPI equations could be more accurate than the original equations for elderly Chinese individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27757839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.