Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757553›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2017

Fosaprepitant versus droperidol for prevention of PONV in craniotomy: a randomized double-blind study.

Jun Atsuta, Satoki Inoue, Yuu Tanaka, Keiko Abe, Hiroyuki Nakase, Masahiko Kawaguchi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun AtsutaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan. atsutajun@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-8658
Satoki InoueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Yuu TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Keiko AbeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Hiroyuki NakaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Masahiko KawaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after craniotomy. Vomiting may be a potentially hazardous complication in neurosurgical patients. We compared the efficacy of fosaprepitant and droperidol for the prevention of PONV, vomiting in particular, after craniotomy.

methodsPatients scheduled to undergo elective craniotomy were enrolled in the study and randomly divided in a double-blind manner into two groups to receive either 150 mg of fosaprepitant (group F) or 1.25 mg of droperidol (group D). Dexamethasone (9.9 mg) was given to all patients, except those with diabetes mellitus. The incidence of PONV, frequency of vomiting, nausea score, and use of rescue antiemetic during the first 72 h after surgery were assessed at five time intervals (0-2, 2-6, 6-24, 24-48, and 48-72 h).

resultsOf the 200 randomized patients eligible for entry into the study, 186 were ultimately included for analysis. There were no significant differences in demographics or intraoperative variables between the two treatment groups. Over the entire 72-h post-craniotomy observation period the overall and cumulative incidence of vomiting was significantly lower in group F patients than in group D patients, while there were no between-group differences in the overall and cumulative incidence of PONV or in complete response (no PONV and no rescue antiemetic). The incidence and frequency of vomiting during each of the five observational periods were significantly lower in group F patients than group D patients, although there were no differences in the nausea score and antiemetic use between the groups.

conclusionBased on the results, fosaprepitant was more effective than droperidol in the prevention of vomiting after craniotomy over the entire 72-h study period. However, there was no difference in the incidence of nausea and antiemetic use.

Indexed as

AgedAntiemeticsCraniotomyDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodDroperidolElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAntiemeticsDexamethasoneDroperidolfosaprepitantMorpholinesCraniotomyDroperidolFosaprepitantPONV

Identifiers

PMID27757553
OpenAlexW2535267730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.