Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery: feasibility and possible complications during the incision of the posterior vaginal wall.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A systematic review on the cost evaluation of two different laparoscopic surgical techniques among 996 appendectomies from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2020
   Pooled it
2. What is the applicability of tubal ligation with the vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique and its value in patient comfort?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
   Article
3. In-bag extraction of tissue through an incision in the posterior vaginal wall in laparoscopic myomectomy: a large retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2023
   Article
4. Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity matching study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023
   Article
5. Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.Updates in surgery · 2022
   Review
6. Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study.Scientific reports · 2020
   Article
7. Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020
   Article
8. Tumor markers of uterine cervical cancer: a new scenario to guide surgical practice?Updates in surgery · 2017
   Review
9. New procedures for the identification of sentinel lymph node: shaping the horizon of future management in early stage uterine cervical cancer.Updates in surgery · 2017
   Review
10. Response of the authors to comment by Lagana et al. on: Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery (World J Urol. 2016 Jun; 34(6):779-87).World journal of urology · 2017
    Article
11. Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives.Updates in surgery · 2017
    Review
12. Preoperative work-up for definition of lymph node risk involvement in early stage endometrial cancer: 5-year follow-up.Updates in surgery · 2017
    Article
13. Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in simple nephrectomy.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
14. The Significant Risk Factors of Intra-Operative Hemorrhage during Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Systematic Review.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response of the authors to comment by Lagana et al. on: Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery (World J Urol. 2016 Jun; 34(6):779-87).2017
• Comment on
  Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.2016

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as