ReviewHNO2016
[Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants : Current aspects].
Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Review
- Advances in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant and Middle Ear Prostheses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Inner Ear Infections.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Presbycusis: An Update on Cochlear Mechanisms and Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local drug application to the inner ear offers a number of advantages over systemic delivery. Local drug therapy currently encompasses extracochlear administration (intratympanic injection); intracochlear administration, particularly for gene and stem cell therapy; as well as various combinations with auditory neurosensory prostheses, either evaluated in preclinical or clinical studies, or off-label. To improve rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), one focus is the development of drug-releasing electrode carriers, e. g., to deliver glucocorticosteroids, antiapoptotic substances, or neurotrophines to the inner ear. By protecting neuronal structures from insertion trauma, reducing fibrosis in the inner ear, and by stimulating growth of neuronal structures in the direction of the electrodes, the performance of CIs should be improved. Controlled drug release after extracochlear or intracochlear application in conjunction with a CI can be achieved by, e.g., use of a biocompatible, resorbable controlled-release drug delivery systems. Two case reports are presented. In order to treat worsened speech discrimination and increased impedance, these CI-wearing patients successfully underwent intracochlear placement of a biocompatible, resorbable drug delivery system for controlled release of dexamethasone. The drug levels reached in inner ear fluids after different types of local drug application strategies can be calculated using computer models. The intracochlear drug concentrations calculated in this way were compared for different dexamethasone application strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.