Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757349›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2016

Cross-Face Nerve Grafting with Infraorbital Nerve Pathway Protection: Anatomic and Histomorphometric Feasibility Study.

Joseph Catapano, Daniel R B Demsey, Emily S Ho, Ronald M Zuker, Gregory H Borschel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph CatapanoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel R B DemseyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily S HoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ronald M ZukerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gregory H BorschelDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smiling is an important aspect of emotional expression and social interaction, leaving facial palsy patients with impaired social functioning and decreased overall quality of life. Although there are several techniques available for facial reanimation, staged facial reanimation using donor nerve branches from the contralateral, functioning facial nerve connected to a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) is the only technique that can reliably reproduce an emotionally spontaneous smile. Although CFNGs provide spontaneity, they typically produce less smile excursion than when the subsequent free functioning muscle flap is innervated with the motor nerve to the masseter muscle. This may be explained in part by the larger number of donor motor axons when using the masseter nerve, as studies have shown that only 20% to 50% of facial nerve donor axons successfully cross the nerve graft to innervate their targets. As demonstrated in our animal studies, increasing the number of donor axons that grow into and traverse the CFNG to innervate the free muscle transfer increases muscle movement, and this phenomenon may provide patients with the benefit of improved smile excursion. We have previously shown in animal studies that sensory nerves, when coapted to a nerve graft, improve axonal growth through the nerve graft and improve muscle excursion. Here, we describe the feasibility of and our experience in translating these results clinically by coapting the distal portion of the CFNG to branches of the infraorbital nerve.

Identifiers

PMID27757349
PMCPMC5055015
OpenAlexW2522274248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.