Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757341›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2016

Avoiding a Systematic Error in Assessing Fat Graft Survival in the Breast with Repeated Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Peter V Glovinski, Mikkel Herly, Felix C Müller, Jens J Elberg, Stig-Frederik T Kølle, Anne Fischer-Nielsen, Carsten Thomsen, Krzysztof T Drzewiecki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. New Validated Method for Measuring Fat Graft Retention in the Breast with MRI.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Article
  7. A Novel Porcine Model for Future Studies of Cell-enriched Fat Grafting.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter V GlovinskiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel HerlyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Felix C MüllerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens J ElbergDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig-Frederik T KølleDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Fischer-NielsenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten ThomsenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Krzysztof T DrzewieckiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cell Therapy Facility, The Blood Bank, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several techniques for measuring breast volume (BV) are based on examining the breast on magnetic resonance imaging. However, when techniques designed to measure total BV are used to quantify BV changes, for example, after fat grafting, a systematic error is introduced because BV changes lead to contour alterations of the breast. The volume of the altered breast includes not only the injected volume but also tissue previously surrounding the breast. Therefore, the quantitative difference in BV before and after augmentation will differ from the injected volume. Here, we present a new technique to measure BV changes that compensates for this systematic error by defining the boundaries of the breast to immovable osseous pointers. This approach avoids the misinterpretation of tissue included within the expanded boundaries as graft tissue. This new method of analysis may be a reliable tool for assessing BV changes to determine fat graft retention and may be useful for evaluating and comparing available surgical techniques for breast augmentation and reconstruction using fat grafting.

Identifiers

PMID27757341
PMCPMC5055007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.