Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757339›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2016

Shift toward Mechanical Isolation of Adipose-derived Stromal Vascular Fraction: Review of Upcoming Techniques.

Alexandra Condé-Green, Vasanth S Kotamarti, Lauren S Sherman, Jonathan D Keith, Edward S Lee, Mark S Granick, Pranela Rameshwar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Applications of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Stromal Vascular Matrix for Osteoarthritis: A Commentary.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra Condé-GreenDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Vasanth S KotamartiDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Lauren S ShermanDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Jonathan D KeithDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Edward S LeeDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Mark S GranickDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Pranela RameshwarDepartment of General Surgery - Plastic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and †Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Newark, N.J.; and Department of Medicine - Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard isolation of adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) requires the use of collagenase and is considered more than "minimally manipulated" by current good manufacturing practice requirements. Alternatively, nonenzymatic isolation methods have surfaced using physical forces to separate cells from the adipose matrix. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the use of mechanical isolation protocols and compare the results. The implication for use as a standard procedure in practice is discussed.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed on mechanical isolation of SVF with a search of six terms on PubMed and Medline databases. One thousand sixty-six articles were subject to evaluation by predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

resultsTwo level 2 evidence articles and 7 in vitro studies were selected. SVF was isolated using automated closed systems or by subjecting the lipoaspirate to centrifugation only or by shaking or vortexing followed by centrifugation. Six articles reported isolation in laboratory settings and three inside the operating room. Stromal vascular cells expressed CD34, and CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105, and differentiated along adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. When compared with enzymatic methods, mechanical isolation required less time but yielded fewer cells. Both case-control studies reported improved volume retention with cell-supplemented fat grafts for breast reconstruction.

conclusionsMechanical isolation methods are alternatives to circumvent safety issues posed by enzymatic protocols. However, randomized comparative studies with long-term clinical outcomes using mechanically isolated stromal vascular cells are needed to identify their ideal clinical applications.

Identifiers

PMID27757339
PMCPMC5055005
OpenAlexW2513059421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.