ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2016
THE CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND BIOMECHANICAL PRESENTATION OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP ABDUCTOR TENDON TEARS.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low quality evidence supports surgery for gluteal tendon tears, no non-surgical evidence was identified: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- The pre-operative physical component subscale of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey was the only factor associated with 2-year clinical outcome and satisfaction after hip abductor tendon repair.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Integration of Shear-Wave Elastography and Inertial Motion Sensing for Quantitative Monitoring of Tendon Remodeling After Shockwave Therapy in Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Open Hip Abductor Repair: Double-Row, Rip-Stop Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Sonographic pathoanatomy of greater trochanteric pain syndrome.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Association between abductor tears and hip pathology: A nationwide large cohort study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- The Utilization of Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Gluteus Medius Tendon Pathology: A Perspective for Rehabilitation Providers.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Recommendations in the rehabilitation of patients undergoing hip abductor tendon repair: a systematic literature search and evidence based rehabilitation protocol.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Review
- "I feel I have been taken seriously" Women's experience of greater trochanteric pain syndrome treatment-A nested qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- The natural history of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: an 11-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Lesions of the abductors in the hip.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
- Does low back pain or leg pain in gluteus medius syndrome contribute to lumbar degenerative disease and hip osteoarthritis and vice versa? A literature review.Journal of physical therapy science · 2020Review
- A Prospective 2-Year Clinical Evaluation of Augmented Hip Abductor Tendon Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
- Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: An Intraoperative Endoscopic Classification System with Pearls to Surgical Techniques and Rehabilitation Protocols.Arthroscopy techniques · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip abductor tendon (HAT) tearing is commonly implicated in greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), though limited information exists on the disability associated with this condition and specific presentation of these patients. PURPOSE: To describe the clinical, functional and biomechanical presentation of patients with symptomatic HAT tears. Secondary purposes were to investigate the association between these clinical and functional measures, and to compare the pain and disability reported by HAT tear patients to those with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). STUDY
designProspective case series.
methodsOne hundred forty-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic HAT tears were evaluated using the Harris (HHS) and Oxford (OHS) Hip Scores, SF-12, an additional series of 10 questions more pertinent to those with lateral hip pain, active hip range of motion (ROM), maximal isometric hip abduction strength, six-minute walk capacity and 30-second single limb stance (SLS) test. The presence of a Trendelenburg sign and pelvis-on-femur (POF) angle were determined via 2D video analysis. An age matched comparative sample of patients with end-stage hip OA was recruited for comparison of all patient-reported outcome scores. Independent t-tests investigated group and limb differences, while analysis of variance evaluated pain changes during the functional tests. Pearson's correlation coefficients investigated the correlation between clinical measures in the HAT tear group.
resultsNo differences existed in patient demographics and patient-reported outcome scores between HAT tear and hip OA cohorts, apart from significantly worse SF-12 mental subscale scores (p = 0.032) in the HAT tear group. Patients with HAT tears demonstrated significantly lower (p < 0.05) hip abduction strength and active ROM in all planes of motion on their affected limb. Pain significantly increased throughout the 30-second SLS test for the HAT tear group, with 57% of HAT tear patients demonstrating a positive Trendelenburg sign. POF angle during the test was not significantly associated with pain.
conclusionPatients with symptomatic HAT tears demonstrate poor function, and report pain and disability similar to or worse than those with end-stage hip OA. This information better defines and differentiates the presentation of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 case-controlled study, with matched comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27757285PMC5046966W2553696029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.