Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27757221›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2016

Conservation and divergence of bHLH genes in the calcisponge

Sofia A V Fortunato, Michel Vervoort, Marcin Adamski, Maja Adamska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sponge bHLH Gene Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Parallel Evolution of Transcription Factors in Basal Metazoans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sofia A V Fortunato *Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Michel Vervoort *Institut Jacques Monod - CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, 75005 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Marcin AdamskiSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Maja AdamskaSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-8450
Australian National University · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) genes encode a large family of eukaryotic transcription factors, categorized into six high-order groups: pan-eukaryotic group B involved in regulation of cell cycle, metabolism, and development; holozoan-specific groups C and F involved in development and maintenance of homeostasis; and metazoan-specific groups A, D and E including well-studied genes, such as

resultsGiven recently discovered differences in developmental toolkit components between siliceous and calcareous sponges, we have carried out genome-wide analysis of bHLH genes in

conclusionsOur results demonstrate independent gene loss events in demosponges and calcisponges, implying a complex bHLH toolkit in the last common metazoan ancestor.

Indexed as

bHLHDevelopmental regulatory genesEvolutionSpongesSycon ciliatumTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID27757221
PMCPMC5064789
OpenAlexW2529956550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.