ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interrelationships of long-term changes in recovery domains among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a six-year follow-up study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Social Media Use Among Emerging Adults With Psychosis: Oversights and Opportunities.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Social Factors and Recovery: A Longitudinal Study of Patients with Psychosis in Mental Health Services.Community mental health journal · 2023Observational
- Affective lability and social functioning in severe mental disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022Article
- Schizophrenia: a Narrative Review of Etiological and Diagnostic Issues.Consortium psychiatricum · 2022Review
- Social motivation and behavior in first-episode psychosis: Unique contributions to social quality of life and social functioning.Journal of psychiatric research · 2021Article
- Psychotherapy in Psychosis: Experiences of Fully Recovered Service Users.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.