Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756910›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2017

Validation of the mutant selection window hypothesis with fosfomycin against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study.

Ai-Jun Pan, Qing Mei, Ying Ye, Hong-Ru Li, Bao Liu, Jia-Bin Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Fosfomycin againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fosfomycin in antimicrobial stewardship programs.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  14. Intravenous Fosfomycin: An Assessment of Its Potential for Use in the Treatment of Systemic Infections in Canada.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ai-Jun PanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Qing MeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ying YeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hong-Ru LiClass 2012, The Eight-year Program on Clinical Medicine, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Bao LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jia-Bin LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Academy of Medical Sciences · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the mutant selection window (MSW) hypothesis in vitro and in vivo with Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to fosfomycin. Two standard strains of Gram-negative bacteria, those are E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, were exposed to fosfomycin at concentrations below MIC, between the MIC and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), and above the MPC in Luria-Bertani broth and in a tissue-cage infection model, respectively. With the in vitro time-kill studies, there were bacterial re-growth and emergence of resistance thereafter for both strains at antibiotic concentrations of × 4, × 8 and × 16 MIC. In our animal model, the loss in susceptibility of P. aeruginosa at fosfomycin concentrations fluctuated between the lower and upper boundaries of the MSW. In contrast, the emergence of resistant mutants of E. coli was not observed in vivo, regardless of fosfomycin dosage. Interestingly, the in vitro-isolated resistant mutants of E. coli showed a decreased growth rate compared with the susceptible parental strains, whereas no fitness cost in P. aeruginosa was observed. The emergence of antibiotic resistance is shaped by several factors. MSW theory may not apply to all antimicrobial-pathogen combinations. Before it can be used as a framework for the design of antimicrobial therapy, the existence of the window must be demonstrated not only in vitro but also in vivo.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiffusion Chambers, CultureDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleFosfomycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationOxygenPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinOxygen

Identifiers

PMID27756910
OpenAlexW2537932703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.