Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756884›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

Early2 factor (E2F) deregulation is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma.

Lu Chen, Courtney A Kurtyka, Eric A Welsh, Jason I Rivera, Brienne E Engel, Teresita Muñoz-Antonia, Sean J Yoder, Steven A Eschrich, Ben C Creelan, Alberto A Chiappori and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prognostic Value of E2F Transcription Factor Expression in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu ChenBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Courtney A KurtykaBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Eric A WelshBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jason I RiveraBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Brienne E EngelCancer Biology and Evolution, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Teresita Muñoz-AntoniaTumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Sean J YoderMolecular Genomics Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Steven A EschrichBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ben C CreelanThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Alberto A ChiapporiThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jhanelle E GrayThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jose Luis RamirezCancer Biology & Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael RosellCancer Biology & Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthew B SchabathCancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Eric B HauraThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Dung-Tsa ChenBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
W Douglas CressCancer Biology and Evolution, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ES

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Using MC1R genotype to impact skin cancer risk behaviors in Hispanics/LatinosU54CA163068 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Shannon Marie Christy · 2012 to 2026
$23.1M
SPORE in Lung CancerP50CA119997 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GABRILOVICH, DMITRY I · 2008 to 2012
$11.0M
Transcriptional Control of Mcl-1 and Bok/Mtd by E2F1R01CA090489 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI CRESS, WILLIAM D · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF BRCA1 MUTANTSR01CA092309 · NCI · STRANG CANCER PREVENTION CENTER · PI MONTEIRO, ALVARO N · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS P50 CA119997NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090489NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092309NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians routinely prescribe adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. However, ACT only improves five-year disease-free survival in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer by 5-15%, with most patients deriving no benefit. Herein, deregulation of the E2F pathway was explored as a biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma patients. An E2F pathway scoring system, based on 74 E2F-regulated genes, was trained for RNA from two platforms: fresh-frozen (FF) or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. The E2F score was tested as a prognostic biomarker in five FF-based cohorts and two FFPE-based cohorts. The E2F score was tested as a predictive biomarker in two randomized clinical trials; JBR10 and the NATCH (Neo-Adjuvant Taxol-Carboplatin Hope) trial. The E2F score was prognostic in untreated patients in all seven datasets examined (p < 0.05). Stage-specific analysis of combined cohorts demonstrated that the E2F score was prognostic in stage I patients (p = 0.0495 to <0.001; hazard ratio, HR, =2.04- 2.22) with a similar trend in other stages. The E2F score was strongly predictive in stage II patients from the two combined randomized clinical trials with a significant differential treatment effect (p = 0.015). Specifically, ACT improved survival in stage II patients with high E2F (p = 0.01; HR= 0.21). The 5-year survival increased from 18% to 81%. In contrast, in patients with low E2F, 5-year survival was 57% in untreated patients and 41% in ACT-treated patients with a HR of 1.55 (p = 0.47). In summary, the E2F score provides valuable prognostic information for Stage I and predictive information for Stage II lung adenocarcinoma patients and should be further explored as a decision support tool for their treatment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinCell Line, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantE2F Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinE2F Transcription FactorsPaclitaxeladjuvant chemotherapyE2Flung adenocarcinomapredictive biomarkerprognostic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID27756884
PMCPMC5347689
OpenAlexW2530610620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.