Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756739›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2016

Defining the fracture population in a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROFHER and the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures.

H H G Handoll, S D Brealey, L Jefferson, A Keding, A J Brooksbank, A J Johnstone, J J Candal-Couto, A Rangan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of operative timing for proximal humerus fracture dislocations on development of neurologic injury.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

H H G HandollHealth and Social Care Institute, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BA, UK.
S D BrealeyYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
L JeffersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
A KedingYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
A J BrooksbankDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
A J JohnstoneOrthopaedic Trauma Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK.
J J Candal-CoutoNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, Northumberland, NE63 9JJ, UK.
A RanganDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK amar.rangan@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBTeesside University · GBWansbeck General Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 06/404/502Department of Health 06/404/53
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurate characterisation of fractures is essential in fracture management trials. However, this is often hampered by poor inter-observer agreement. This article describes the practicalities of defining the fracture population, based on the Neer classification, within a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial in which surgical treatment was compared with non-surgical treatment in adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck.

methodsThe trial manual illustrated the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures. However, in addition to surgical neck displacement, surgeons assessing patient eligibility reported on whether either or both of the tuberosities were involved. Anonymised electronic versions of baseline radiographs were sought for all 250 trial participants. A protocol, data collection tool and training presentation were developed and tested in a pilot study. These were then used in a formal assessment and classification of the trial fractures by two independent senior orthopaedic shoulder trauma surgeons.

resultsTwo or more baseline radiographic views were obtained for each participant. The independent raters confirmed that all fractures would have been considered for surgery in contemporaneous practice. A full description of the fracture population based on the Neer classification was obtained. The agreement between the categorisation at baseline (tuberosity involvement) and Neer classification as assessed by the two raters was only fair (kappa 0.29). However, this disparity did not appear to affect trial findings, specifically in terms of influencing the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of the trial.

conclusionsA key reporting requirement, namely the description of the fracture population, was achieved within the context of a pragmatic multicentre randomised clinical trial. This article provides important guidance for researchers designing similar trials on fracture management.Cite this article: H. H. G. Handoll, S. D. Brealey, L. Jefferson, A. Keding, A. J. Brooksbank, A. J. Johnstone, J. J. Candal-Couto, A. Rangan. Defining the fracture population in a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROFHER and the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures.Bone Joint Res 2016;5:481-489. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0132.R1.

Indexed as

Fracture classificationPragmatic randomised controlled trialsProximal humeral fractures

Identifiers

PMID27756739
PMCPMC5086839
OpenAlexW2536753329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.