Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756342›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

The relation between the patient health questionnaire-15 and DSM somatic diagnoses.

Shih-Cheng Liao, Wei-Lieh Huang, Huei-Mei Ma, Min-Tzu Lee, Tzu-Ting Chen, I-Ming Chen, Susan Shur-Fen Gau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shih-Cheng LiaoDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Wei-Lieh HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan (Republic of China). weiliehhuang@gmail.com.
Huei-Mei MaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, No.579, Sec. 2, Yunlin Rd, Douliu City, Yunlin County, 64041, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Min-Tzu LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, No.579, Sec. 2, Yunlin Rd, Douliu City, Yunlin County, 64041, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Tzu-Ting ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, No.579, Sec. 2, Yunlin Rd, Douliu City, Yunlin County, 64041, Taiwan (Republic of China).
I-Ming ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Susan Shur-Fen GauDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan (Republic of China).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur purpose was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) in Taiwan, and to explore its relation to somatoform disorders (DSM-IV) and to somatic symptom and related disorders (DSM-5).

methodsWe recruited 471 individuals, 151 with somatoform disorders and 200 with somatic symptom and related disorders. Subjects completed the Chinese version of the PHQ-15, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and received a DSM-IV- and DSM-5-based diagnostic interview. We performed exploratory factor analysis and assessed test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and correlation with BDI-II/BAI to confirm reliability and validity, and carried out ROC curve analysis to determine suitability for evaluation or screening purposes. PHQ-15 scores were compared between patients with various DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses (such as DSM-IV somatoform disorders, panic disorder, other anxiety/depressive disorders) or no DSM-IV diagnosis and patients with DSM-5 somatic symptom and related disorders or no DSM-5 diagnosis.

resultsThe Chinese version identified cardiopulmonary, pain-fatigue, and gastrointestinal as major factors and had good reliability (0.803-0.930), internal consistency (0.637-0.861), and correlation coefficients with BDI-II/BAI (0.407-0.619, 0.536-0.721, respectively). The PHQ-15 scores were similar in patients with somatoform disorders and patients with panic disorder; higher in patients with somatoform disorders and panic disorder than in patients with other anxiety/depressive disorders; and significantly higher in patients with somatic symptom and related disorders than in patients without this diagnosis. The AUC of the PHQ-15 was 0.678 (cutoff 6/7) for screening somatoform disorders (DSM-IV) and 0.725 (cutoff 4/5) for screening somatic symptom and related disorders (DSM-5).

conclusionsThe Chinese version of the PHQ-15 is suitable for evaluating somatic symptom and related disorders. The preponderance of somatic symptom disorder in our sample, lack of evaluation of functional disorders, and recruitment solely from psychiatric clinics are possible limitations.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderDiagnostic Self EvaluationFatigueFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSomatoform DisordersPatient Health Questionnaire-15Somatic symptom and related disordersSomatic symptom disorderSomatoform disorders

Identifiers

PMID27756342
PMCPMC5070166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.