Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756296›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2016

Using linked administrative and disease-specific databases to study end-of-life care on a population level.

Arno Maetens, Robrecht De Schreye, Kristof Faes, Dirk Houttekier, Luc Deliens, Birgit Gielen, Cindy De Gendt, Patrick Lusyne, Lieven Annemans, Joachim Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care: A Scoping Review and Directions for Future Nursing Research.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arno MaetensEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Arno.maetens@vub.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-6036
Robrecht De SchreyeEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristof FaesEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk HouttekierEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Birgit GielenInterMutualistic Agency, Brussels, Belgium.
Cindy De GendtBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Patrick LusyneStatistics Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Lieven AnnemansInteruniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Joachim CohenEnd of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of full-population databases is under-explored to study the use, quality and costs of end-of-life care. Using the case of Belgium, we explored: (1) which full-population databases provide valid information about end-of-life care, (2) what procedures are there to use these databases, and (3) what is needed to integrate separate databases.

methodsTechnical and privacy-related aspects of linking and accessing Belgian administrative databases and disease registries were assessed in cooperation with the database administrators and privacy commission bodies. For all relevant databases, we followed procedures in cooperation with database administrators to link the databases and to access the data.

resultsWe identified several databases as fitting for end-of-life care research in Belgium: the InterMutualistic Agency's national registry of health care claims data, the Belgian Cancer Registry including data on incidence of cancer, and databases administrated by Statistics Belgium including data from the death certificate database, the socio-economic survey and fiscal data. To obtain access to the data, approval was required from all database administrators, supervisory bodies and two separate national privacy bodies. Two Trusted Third Parties linked the databases via a deterministic matching procedure using multiple encrypted social security numbers.

conclusionIn this article we describe how various routinely collected population-level databases and disease registries can be accessed and linked to study patterns in the use, quality and costs of end-of-life care in the full population and in specific diagnostic groups.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareRegistriesAlzheimer DiseaseBelgiumDatabases, FactualHealth Care CostsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalNeoplasmsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTerminal CareAdministrative databasesData linkageDisease-specific databasesEnd-of-lifeFull-population

Identifiers

PMID27756296
PMCPMC5069861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.