Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756295›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Leveraging quality improvement through use of the Systems Assessment Tool in Indigenous primary health care services: a mixed methods study.

Frances C Cunningham, Sue Ferguson-Hill, Veronica Matthews, Ross Bailie

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An analysis of current obesity strategies for adolescents in NSW against best practice recommendations: Implications for researchers, policymakers and practitioners.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rural and remote health research: Does the investment match the need?The Australian journal of rural health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frances C CunninghamWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Spring Hill, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. frances.cunningham@menzies.edu.au.
Sue Ferguson-HillNational Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Spring Hill, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Veronica MatthewsWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Spring Hill, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Ross BailieUniversity Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of the quality of primary health care health delivery systems is a vital part of continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes. The Systems Assessment Tool (SAT) was designed to support Indigenous PHC services in assessing and improving their health care systems. It was based on the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care scale, and on practical experience with applying systems assessments in quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care. We describe the development and application of the SAT, report on a survey to assess the utility of the SAT and review the use of the SAT in other CQI research programs.

methodsThe mixed methods approach involved a review of documents and internal reports relating to experience with use of the SAT since its development in 2002 and a survey of key informants on their experience with using the SAT.

resultsThe paper drew from documents and internal reports to describe the SAT development and application in primary health care services from 2002 to 2014. Survey feedback highlighted the benefit to the whole primary health care team from participating in the SAT, bringing to light issues that might not emerge with separate individual tool completion. A majority of respondents reported changes in their health centres as a result of using the SAT. Good organisational and management support assisted with ensuring allocation of time and resources for SAT conduct. Respondents identified the importance of having a skilled, external facilitator.

conclusionsOriginally designed as a measurement tool, the SAT rapidly evolved to become an important development tool, assisting teams in learning about primary health care system functioning, applying best practice and contributing to team strengthening. It is valued by primary health care centres as a lever in implementing improvements to strengthen centre delivery systems, and has potential for further adaptation and wider application in Australia and internationally.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAustraliaChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMalePrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexChronic diseaseData collection toolHealthcare systemsIndigenous healthOrganisational assessmentPrimary health careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27756295
PMCPMC5070177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.