ArticleBMC medical imaging2016
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The global prevalence of gastric cancer in Helicobacter pylori-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- An atlas of glucose uptake across the entire human body as measured by the total-body PET/CT scanner: a pilot study.Life metabolism · 2022Article
- Role in staging and prognostic value of pretherapeutic F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with gastric MALT lymphoma without high-grade transformation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Staging FDG PET-CT changes management in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who are eligible for radical treatment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Correlation between serum vitamin B12 level and peripheral neuropathy in atrophic gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Observational
- Gross Tumor Delineation in Esophageal Cancer on MRI Compared WithAdvances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the value of
methodsAmong subjects who underwent
resultsSUV indicators of the stomach were significantly higher in subjects with H. pylori infection than those without (from P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed that SUVmean had the highest performance in predicting H. pylori infection (AUC 0.807) and chronic atrophic gastritis (AUC 0.784). SUVmean exhibited the sensitivity of 86.5 % and the specificity of 70.6 % in predicting H. pylori infection, and the sensitivity of 75.0 % and 78.6 % in predicting chronic atrophic gastritis.
conclusionAssessment of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.