Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756228›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Drug discovery using clinical outcome-based Connectivity Mapping: application to ovarian cancer.

Rama Raghavan, Stephen Hyter, Harsh B Pathak, Andrew K Godwin, Gottfried Konecny, Chen Wang, Ellen L Goode, Brooke L Fridley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rama RaghavanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Stephen HyterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Harsh B PathakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Andrew K GodwinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Gottfried KonecnyDepartment of Medicine, Hematology & Oncology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Chen WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Ellen L GoodeDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Brooke L FridleyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. bfridley@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Kansas BIRCWH Career Development Program Women's HealthK12HD052027 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E · 2005 to 2014
$5.0M
Genetic Variation in the NF-kappaB Pathway and Ovarian Cancer EtiologyR01CA122443 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GOODE, ELLEN L. · 2007 to 2012
$2.7M
Bayesian Integrative Clustering for Determining Molecular Based Cancer SubtyR21CA182715 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI FRIDLEY, BROOKE L · 2014 to 2015
$377k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122443NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182715NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052027NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States (5 % of cancer deaths). The standard treatment for patients with advanced EOC is initial debulking surgery followed by carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Unfortunately, with chemotherapy most patients relapse and die resulting in a five-year overall survival around 45 %. Thus, finding novel therapeutics for treating EOC is essential. Connectivity Mapping (CMAP) has been used widely in cancer drug discovery and generally has relied on cancer cell line gene expression and drug phenotype data. Therefore, we took a CMAP approach based on tumor information and clinical endpoints from high grade serous EOC patients.

methodsWe determined tumor gene expression signatures (e.g., sets of genes) associated with time to recurrence (with and without adjustment for additional clinical covariates) among patients within TCGA (n = 407) and, separately, from the Mayo Clinic (n = 326). Each gene signature was inputted into CMAP software (Broad Institute) to determine a set of drugs for which our signature "matches" the "reference" signature, and drugs that overlapped between the CMAP analyses and the two studies were carried forward for validation studies involving drug screens on a set of 10 EOC cell lines.

resultsOf the 11 drugs carried forward, five (mitoxantrone, podophyllotoxin, wortmannin, doxorubicin, and 17-AAG) were known a priori to be cytotoxics and were indeed shown to effect EOC cell viability.

conclusionsFuture research is needed to investigate the use of these CMAP and similar analyses for determining combination therapies that might work synergistically to kill cancer cells and to apply this in silico bioinformatics approach using clinical outcomes to other cancer drug screening studies.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsRecurrenceAntineoplastic AgentsBioinformaticsConnectivity MappingDrug discoveryGene expression signatureOvarian cancerTime to recurrence

Identifiers

PMID27756228
PMCPMC5069875
OpenAlexW2533158374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.