Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27756226›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Comparative analysis of a sex chromosome from the blackchin tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron.

William J Gammerdinger, Matthew A Conte, Jean-François Baroiller, Helena D'Cotta, Thomas D Kocher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility study of core training in knee injury recovery.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Absence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gene Variant ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Origin of a Giant Sex Chromosome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Disagreement in FMolecular ecology resources · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William J GammerdingerDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Matthew A ConteDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Jean-François BaroillerUMR-ISEM, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
Helena D'CottaUMR-ISEM, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
Thomas D KocherDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. tdk@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USAgropolis International · FRInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInversions and other structural polymorphisms often reduce the rate of recombination between sex chromosomes, making it impossible to fine map sex-determination loci using traditional genetic mapping techniques. Here we compare distantly related species of tilapia that each segregate an XY system of sex-determination on linkage group 1. We use whole genome sequencing to identify shared sex-patterned polymorphisms, which are candidates for the ancestral sex-determination mutation.

resultsWe found that Sarotherodon melanotheron segregates an XY system on LG1 in the same region identified in Oreochromis niloticus. Both species have higher densities of sex-patterned SNPs, as well as elevated number of ancestral copy number variants in this region when compared to the rest of the genome, but the pattern of differentiation along LG1 differs between species. The number of sex-patterned SNPs shared by the two species is small, but larger than expected by chance, suggesting that a novel Y-chromosome arose just before the divergence of the two species. We identified a shared sex-patterned SNP that alters a Gata4 binding site near Wilms tumor protein that might be responsible for sex-determination.

conclusionsShared sex-patterned SNPs, insertions and deletions suggest an ancestral sex-determination system that is common to both S. melanotheron and O. niloticus. Functional analyses are needed to evaluate shared SNPs near candidate genes that might play a role in sex-determination of these species. Interspecific variation in the sex chromosomes of tilapia species provides an excellent model system for understanding the evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes.

Indexed as

Sex ChromosomesAnimalsBiological EvolutionChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenetic LinkageHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSex Determination ProcessesTilapiaAfrican cichlidsSex chromosome evolutionSex-determination

Identifiers

PMID27756226
PMCPMC5070092
OpenAlexW2536210088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.