ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2017
2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting.
Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Quality in Interventional Practice: Identifying Meaningful and Actionable Metrics.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- A risk-adjustment model for patients presenting to hospitals with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Resuscitation · 2022Article
- Perceptions of Public and Nonpublic Reporting of Interventional Cardiology Outcomes and Its Impact on Practice: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Stable Patients With Significant Comorbidities: Challenges in Decision-Making.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Assessing Performance and Quality After Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Moving Beyond the Status Quo.JAMA cardiology · 2018Review
- Nonpublic Internal Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Improving Quality Without Risk Avoidance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
- Influence of Major Adverse Events on Procedural Selection for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.