Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27755540›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Chromosome Specific Substitution Lines of Aegilops geniculata Alter Parameters of Bread Making Quality of Wheat.

Monika Garg, Hisashi Tsujimoto, Raj Kumar Gupta, Aman Kumar, Navneet Kaur, Rohit Kumar, Venkatesh Chunduri, Nand Kishor Sharma, Meenakshi Chawla, Saloni Sharma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perspectives on the utilization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Intraspecific divergence of diploid grassComparative cytogenetics · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparative genomic analysis of 5MFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Production and characterization of a disomic 1M/1DMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Cytogenetic Identification of Wheat-International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Potential ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The karyotype ofMolecular cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization as a source of variation for wheat grain quality improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2018
    Review
  18. Addition ofFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Monika GargNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5589-1360
Hisashi TsujimotoUnited Graduate School of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Raj Kumar GuptaIndian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, India.
Aman KumarNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Navneet KaurNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Rohit KumarNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Venkatesh ChunduriNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Nand Kishor SharmaNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Meenakshi ChawlaNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Saloni SharmaNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.
Jaspreet Kaur MundeyNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali-160071, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat cultivars with wide introgression have strongly impacted global wheat production. Aegilops geniculata (MgUg) is an important wild relative with several useful traits that can be exploited for wheat improvement. Screening of Ae. geniculata addition lines indicated a negative effect of 1Ug and the positive effect of 1Mg chromosome on wheat dough strength. Negative effect of 1Ug is probably associated with variation in number and position of the tripeptide repeat motif in the high molecular weight glutenin (HMW-G) gene. To utilize the positive potential of 1Mg chromosome, three disomic substitution lines (DSLs) 1Mg(1A), 1Mg(1B) and 1Mg(1D) were created. These lines were characterized for morphological, cytogenetic properties and biochemical signatures using FISH, 1D-, 2D-PAGE and RP-HPLC. Contribution of wheat 1A, 1B and 1D chromosomes towards dough mixing and baking parameters, chapatti quality, Fe/Zn content and glume color were identified. Observed order of variation in the dough mixing and baking parameters {1Mg(1D) ≤wheat ≤1Mg(1B) ≤1Mg(1A)} indicated that chromosome specific introgression is desirable for best utilization of wild species' potential.

Indexed as

BreadChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromosomes, PlantElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalGlutensIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePoaceaeRheologySeed Storage ProteinsTriticumgluteninGlutensSeed Storage Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27755540
PMCPMC5068752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.