Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27755538›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2016

Circulating Apolipoprotein E Concentration and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Meta-analysis of Results from Three Studies.

Reecha Sofat, Jackie A Cooper, Meena Kumari, Juan P Casas, Jacqueline P Mitchell, Jayshree Acharya, Simon Thom, Alun D Hughes, Steve E Humphries, Aroon D Hingorani

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety and Effects ofNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Metabolic Crosstalk between Liver and Brain: From Diseases to Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Apolipoprotein E and Atherosclerosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Reecha SofatCentre for Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jackie A CooperCardiovascular Genetics Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Meena KumariInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Juan P CasasFarr Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline P MitchellCardiovascular Genetics Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-9384
Jayshree AcharyaCardiovascular Genetics Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon ThomInternational Centre for Circulatory Health, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alun D HughesCardiometabolic Phenotyping Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-5271
Steve E HumphriesCardiovascular Genetics Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aroon D HingoraniFarr Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBFarr Institute · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601354Medical Research Council G0802318Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association of APOE genotype with circulating apolipoprotein E (ApoE) concentration and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is well established. However, the relationship of circulating ApoE concentration and CVD has received little attention. METHODS AND

findingsTo address this, we measured circulating ApoE concentration in 9,587 individuals (with 1,413 CVD events) from three studies with incident CVD events: two population-based studies, the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the men-only Northwick Park Heart Study II (NPHSII), and a nested sub-study of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). We examined the association of circulating ApoE with cardiovascular risk factors in the two population-based studies (ELSA and NPHSII) and the relationship between ApoE concentration and coronary heart disease and stroke in all three studies. Analyses were carried out within study, and, where appropriate, pooled effect estimates were derived using meta-analysis. In the population-based samples, circulating ApoE was associated with systolic blood pressure (correlation coefficient 0.08, p < 0.001, in both ELSA and NPHSII), total cholesterol (correlation coefficient 0.46 and 0.34 in ELSA and NPHSII, respectively; both p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (correlation coefficient 0.30 and 0.14, respectively; both p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein (correlation coefficient 0.16 and -0.14, respectively; both p < 0.001), and triglycerides (correlation coefficient 0.43 and 0.46, respectivly; both p < 0.001). In NPHSII, ApoE concentration was additionally associated with apolipoprotein B (correlation coefficient 0.13, p = 0.001) and lipoprotein(a) (correlation coefficient -0.11, p < 0.001). In the pooled analysis of ASCOT, ELSA, and NPHSII, there was no association of ApoE with CVD events; the odds ratio (OR) for CVD events per 1-standard-deviation higher ApoE concentration was 1.02 (95% CI 0.96, 1.09). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, the OR for CVD per 1-standard-deviation higher ApoE concentration was 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.15). Limitations of these analyses include a polyclonal method of ApoE measurement, rather than isoform-specific measurement, a moderate sample size (although larger than any other study to our knowledge and with a long lag between ApoE measures), and CVD events that may attenuate an effect.

conclusionsIn the largest study to date on this question, we found no evidence of an association of circulating ApoE concentration with CVD events. The established association of APOE genotype with CVD events may be explained by isoform-specific functions as well as other mechanisms, rather than circulating concentrations of ApoE.

Indexed as

Apolipoproteins ECardiovascular DiseasesFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRisk FactorsStrokeApolipoproteins E

Identifiers

PMID27755538
PMCPMC5068709
OpenAlexW2537275996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.