Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27755535›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Genomic Scars Generated by Polymerase Theta Reveal the Versatile Mechanism of Alternative End-Joining.

Robin van Schendel, Jane van Heteren, Richard Welten, Marcel Tijsterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Short Microhomologies: Mismatch-Compatible Pol θ-Mediated DNA Damage Repair.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Evolutionary Potential of Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Templated insertions-DNA repair gets acrobatic.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multifaceted Nature of DNA Polymerase θ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin van SchendelDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jane van HeterenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Richard WeltenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marcel TijstermanDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 203379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than half a century, genotoxic agents have been used to induce mutations in the genome of model organisms to establish genotype-phenotype relationships. While inaccurate replication across damaged bases can explain the formation of single nucleotide variants, it remained unknown how DNA damage induces more severe genomic alterations. Here, we demonstrate for two of the most widely used mutagens, i.e. ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and photo-activated trimethylpsoralen (UV/TMP), that deletion mutagenesis is the result of polymerase Theta (POLQ)-mediated end joining (TMEJ) of double strand breaks (DSBs). This discovery allowed us to survey many thousands of available C. elegans deletion alleles to address the biology of this alternative end-joining repair mechanism. Analysis of ~7,000 deletion breakpoints and their cognate junctions reveals a distinct order of events. We found that nascent strands blocked at sites of DNA damage can engage in one or more cycles of primer extension using a more downstream located break end as a template. Resolution is accomplished when 3' overhangs have matching ends. Our study provides a step-wise and versatile model for the in vivo mechanism of POLQ action, which explains the molecular nature of mutagen-induced deletion alleles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Polymerase thetaDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEthyl MethanesulfonateGenetic Association StudiesGenomeMutagenesisMutagensSequence DeletionDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase thetaEthyl MethanesulfonateMutagens

Identifiers

PMID27755535
PMCPMC5068794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.