Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27755507›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2017

Modeling Acute ER Stress in Vivo and in Vitro.

Abdikarim Abdullahi, Mile Stanojcic, Alexandra Parousis, David Patsouris, Marc G Jeschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ISR Modulators in Neurological Diseases.Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 5'-tRNANature communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdikarim Abdullahi*Biological Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada †Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada ‡Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada §Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery and Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mile Stanojcic
Alexandra Parousis
David Patsouris
Marc G Jeschke

Funding

Hepatic ER stress contributes to morbidity and mortality after burn injury.R01GM087285 · NIGMS · SUNNYBROOK & WOMEN'S COLL HLTH SCIS CTR · PI BOEHNING, DARREN F, JESCHKE, MARC GERHARD · 2010 to 2018
$1.9M
CIHR 123336NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a critical organelle that synthesizes secretory proteins and serves as the main calcium storage site of the cell. The accumulation of unfolded proteins at the ER results in ER stress. Although the association between ER stress and the pathogenesis of many metabolic conditions have been well characterized using both in vivo and in vitro models, no standardized model concerning ER stress exists. Here, we report a standardized model of ER stress using two well-characterized ER stress-inducing agents, thapsigargin and tunicamycin. Our aim in this current study was 2-fold: to characterize and establish which agent is optimal for in vitro use to model acute ER stress and to evaluate which agent is optimal for in vivo use. To study the first aim we used two well-established metabolic cell lines; human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2s) and differentiated mouse adipocytes (3T3-L1). In the second aim we utilized C57BL/6J mice that were randomized into three treatment groups of sham, thapsigargin, and tunicamycin. Our in vitro results showed that tunicamycin worked as a rapid and efficacious inducer of ER stress in adipocytes consistently, whereas thapsigargin and tunicamycin were equally effective in inducing ER stress in hepatocytes. In regards to our in vivo results, we saw that tunicamycin was superior in not only inducing ER stress but also recapturing the metabolic alterations associated with ER stress. Thus, our findings will help guide and inform researchers as to which ER stress agent is appropriate with regards to their model.

Indexed as

3T3-L1 CellsAdipocytesAnimalsEndoplasmic Reticulum StressHepatocytesHep G2 CellsHumansImmunoblottingMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLPolymerase Chain ReactionThapsigarginTunicamycinThapsigarginTunicamycin

Identifiers

PMID27755507
PMCPMC5348263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.