Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27755163›Full record

ArticleEye & contact lens2018

Epidemiology and Outcome of Microbial Keratitis: Private University Versus Urban Public Hospital Care.

David T Truong, Minh-Thuy Bui, H Dwight Cavanagh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye & contact lens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Autofluorescence Patterns ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Contact lens complications : Diagnosis and treatment].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David T TruongDepartment of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Minh-Thuy Bui
H Dwight Cavanagh
Southwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY020799 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NIEDERKORN, JERRY · 2010 to 2016
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY020799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiologic spectrum, and treatment of microbial keratitis during a 5-year period at an urban public hospital in comparison with an adjacent private university practice.

methodsRetrospective chart review in the 5-year interval, 2009 through 2014. Primary outcome measures included patient age at presentation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), risk factors, culture and sensitivities, treatment, and complication occurrence.

resultsA total of 528 eyes with microbial keratitis were identified, 318 in the public cohort and 210 in the private cohort. Contact lens wear was the most common risk factor in the public cohort, whereas ocular surface disease was the most common risk factor in the private cohort. Gram-positive organisms represented 47.3%, gram-negative organisms 32.1%, fungal organisms 13.6%, and Acanthamoeba 6.4% of corneal isolates. Gentamicin resistance was 4.4% and tobramycin resistance was 2.9%. The inpatient treatment rate of the public cohort was 40% compared with 4% in the private cohort. In the public cohort, average BCVA at resolution was 20/82 (log of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.61). For the private cohort, average BCVA at resolution was 20/73 [logMAR, 0.56]. The perforation rate was 8% in the public cohort compared with 4% in the private cohort. Six percent of cases underwent urgent penetrating keratoplasty in the public cohort versus 2% in the private cohort.

conclusionsMicrobial keratitis remains a clinical challenge in the urban public hospital setting. The risk profile of patients presenting in the public hospital setting may be different from patients presenting in a private care setting. Public hospital patients may present later in the course of their infection and thus have a higher rate of complications regardless of effective antimicrobial therapy.

Indexed as

Eye InfectionsKeratitisAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsContact LensesDrug Resistance, BacterialEye InjuriesFemaleFungiGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHospitals, PublicHospitals, UniversityAnti-Bacterial AgentsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID27755163
PMCPMC5384870
OpenAlexW2531249479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.