Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27754853›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Age and Diet Affect Genetically Separable Secondary Injuries that Cause Acute Mortality Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila.

Rebeccah J Katzenberger, Barry Ganetzky, David A Wassarman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TBI and Tau Loss of Function Both Affect Naïve Ethanol Sensitivity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drosophila as a model to explore secondary injury cascades after traumatic brain injury.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebeccah J KatzenbergerDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Barry GanetzkyDepartment of Genetics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ganetzky@wisc.edu dawassarman@wisc.edu.
David A WassarmanDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ganetzky@wisc.edu dawassarman@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

A Fly Model of Traumatic Brain InjuryR21NS091893 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WASSARMAN, DAVID · 2016 to 2017
$421k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS091893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) vary because of differences in primary and secondary injuries. Primary injuries occur at the time of a traumatic event, whereas secondary injuries occur later as a result of cellular and molecular events activated in the brain and other tissues by primary injuries. We used a Drosophila melanogaster TBI model to investigate secondary injuries that cause acute mortality. By analyzing mortality percentage within 24 hr of primary injuries, we previously found that age at the time of primary injuries and diet afterward affect the severity of secondary injuries. Here, we show that secondary injuries peaked in activity 1-8 hr after primary injuries. Additionally, we demonstrate that age and diet activated distinct secondary injuries in a genotype-specific manner, and that concurrent activation of age- and diet-regulated secondary injuries synergistically increased mortality. To identify genes involved in secondary injuries that cause mortality, we compared genome-wide mRNA expression profiles of uninjured and injured flies under age and diet conditions that had different mortalities. During the peak period of secondary injuries, innate immune response genes were the predominant class of genes that changed expression. Furthermore, age and diet affected the magnitude of the change in expression of some innate immune response genes, suggesting roles for these genes in inhibiting secondary injuries that cause mortality. Our results indicate that the complexity of TBI outcomes is due in part to distinct, genetically controlled, age- and diet-regulated mechanisms that promote secondary injuries and that involve a subset of innate immune response genes.

Indexed as

DietGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAge FactorsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBrain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalDrosophilaFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenetic BackgroundImmunity, InnateMaleMortalityTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticDrosophila Genetic Reference Panelgene expressionhyperglycemia innate immune responserepetitive TBIRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID27754853
PMCPMC5144983
OpenAlexW2538074300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.