Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27754762›Full record

ArticleNucleic acid therapeutics2017

A Cholecystokinin B Receptor-Specific DNA Aptamer for Targeting Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Gary A Clawson, Thomas Abraham, Weihua Pan, Xiaomeng Tang, Samuel S Linton, Christopher O McGovern, Welley S Loc, Jill P Smith, Peter J Butler, Mark Kester and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Pancreatic Cancer: Nucleic Acid Drug Discovery and Targeted Therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tailor-Made Nanomaterials for Diagnosis and Therapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gary A Clawson1 Department of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Laboratories, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Thomas Abraham2 Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences and the Microscopy Imaging Facility, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Weihua Pan1 Department of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Laboratories, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Xiaomeng Tang3 Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, Pennsylvania.
Samuel S Linton5 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Christopher O McGovern5 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Welley S Loc3 Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, Pennsylvania.
Jill P Smith6 Department of Medicine, Georgetown University , Washington, District of Columbia.
Peter J Butler7 Department of Bioengineering, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, Pennsylvania.
Mark Kester8 Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
James H Adair4 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, Pennsylvania.
Gail L Matters5 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania State University · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Novel Nanoparticle Therapy for Pancreatic CancerR01CA167535 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KESTER, MARK, MATTERS, GAIL L. · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Nikon A1 MP+ Multiphoton Microscope for Deep Tissue ImagingS10OD018124 · OD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ABRAHAM, THOMAS · 2015 to 2015
$597k
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000125 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$550k
Targeting Pancreatic Cancer with Aptamers to the CCK-B ReceptorR21CA170121 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MATTERS, GAIL L. · 2013 to 2014
$361k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000125NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167535NCI NIH HHS R21 CA170121NIH HHS S10 OD018124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) constitutively express the G-protein-coupled cholecystokinin B receptor (CCKBR). In this study, we identified DNA aptamers (APs) that bind to the CCKBR and describe their characterization and targeting efficacy. Using dual SELEX selection against "exposed" CCKBR peptides and CCKBR-expressing PDAC cells, a pool of DNA APs was identified. Further downselection was based on predicted structures and properties, and we selected eight APs for initial characterizations. The APs bound specifically to the CCKBR, and we showed not only that they did not stimulate proliferation of PDAC cell lines but rather inhibited their proliferation. We chose one AP, termed AP1153, for further binding and localization studies. We found that AP1153 did not activate CCKBR signaling pathways, and three-dimensional Confocal microscopy showed that AP1153 was internalized by PDAC cells in a receptor-mediated manner. AP1153 showed a binding affinity of 15 pM. Bioconjugation of AP1153 to the surface of fluorescent NPs greatly facilitated delivery of NPs to PDAC tumors in vivo. The selectivity of this AP-targeted NP delivery system holds promise for enhanced early detection of PDAC lesions as well as improved chemotherapeutic treatments for PDAC patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAptamers, NucleotideCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiceMice, NudeMicroscopy, ConfocalNanoconjugatesOptical ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsAptamers, NucleotideNanoconjugatesReceptor, Cholecystokinin BDNA aptamerpancreatic cancertargeted nanoparticlestumor imaging

Identifiers

PMID27754762
PMCPMC5312616
OpenAlexW2545855481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.